Entertainment, TV, Celebrity, Culture

Follow @2Paragraphs
  • Daily Edition
    • Gov Greg AbbottBiden’s Win Helps Gov. Greg Abbott’s Crisis Plan in Texas
    • Kari_LakeKari Lake Equates AR-15s With Rocks, Shares Bible Gun Justification
    • Sarah Huckabee SanderSarah Huckabee Sanders Accidentally Calls Kamala Harris A Great Patriot
  • Business
    • Sen. Elizabeth WarrenSen. Elizabeth Warren Laughs at Bank CEOs Doing Their Own Stress Tests
    • Randi ZuckerbergRandi Zuckerberg Sarcastically Mocks Crypto Boys Club
    • Daymond JohnDaymond John Drops Elon Musk Icebreaker on Twitter, ‘Money v. Meeting’
  • Culture
    • Mariska HargitayMariska Hargitay Flaunts Crop Top Belly Chain Photo, ‘Okay Bodyyyy’
    • Erik Drost [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia CommonsNFL QB Baker Mayfield’s Wife Stuns in Babydoll Lingerie Mini Dress, ‘Girls Trip’
    • Keith RichardsKeith Richards Shares Braless Photo of Wife, Sammy Hagar Reacts
  • Sports
    • Sergio GarciaSergio Garcia’s Wife Flaunts Legs in Tiny Cutout Mini Dress, ‘Supermodel’
    • Naomi Osaka, US Open 2020Naomi Osaka Flaunts Bare Belly in Crop Top, Reveals Victoria’s Secret Collab
    • Gov Greg AbbottTexas Gov. Greg Abbott Picks Alabama Over Houston, Fails Politics 101
  • Food
    • Jennifer GarnerJennifer Garner Reveals Her Favorite ‘Dry January’ Treat at Home
    • Dark ChocolateAre Dark Chocolate Fears Overblown? Cadmium, California, and “Ouch, Ouch” Disease
    • Wendy's restaurantWendy’s New Riddle Stumps Social Media — “Chili in Philly?”
  • Interviews
    • Cranberries_in_a_bucketDo Cranberries Really Help UTI? A Doctor Answers With New Evidence
    • Lauren Lovett The Speech Ring InventorVideo: The Speech Ring Inventor on Overcoming Fear of Public Speaking
    • Surge first out gay superhero in the moviesFirst Out Gay Movie Superhero Surge Speaks on Humor, Responsibility
  • Cool Stuff
    • Ice-T on LAW & ORDER: SVU (Virginia Sherwood/NBC)Ice-T’s Wife Flaunts Brand New Range Rover With Front Seat Refrigerator
    • Bergdorf Goodman 5th Avenue store in NYCChristian Louboutin Reveals 3.5″ Spring Mules With ‘Vibrant Red’ Nail Polish
    • Cardi_BCardi B Says She Hit Jackpot With $30,000 Chanel Slot Machine Bag
  • Contact
  • Privacy

Why is the Supreme Court Camera Shy?

by Michael J. Racette in Law | September 9, 2012

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • Email

Interest in the “historic” 3-day oral arguments in the recent Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality of the Individual Mandate of the 2010 health care legislation was immense.  Yet, except for the few persons lucky or connected enough to have secured a seat inside the court room, anyone who wished to watch the oral arguments was out of luck—forever.  The First Amendment does not guarantee a right to film court proceedings.  Even if Congress were to enact a law requiring broadcast of Supreme Court proceedings (several bills touching on this subject have been introduced in Congress over the years, but none has made it to a vote), Constitutional separation of powers concerns might nullify that law.  So, across the nation, courtroom film rules vary by jurisdiction, type of court, and type of proceeding, and are usually determined on a case-by-case basis.  Typical reasons for disallowing filmed coverage of trial court proceedings include privacy or safety concerns of jurors and witnesses (particularly if children are involved), and (in criminal trials) due process rights.  Although these are either less of or not at all a concern in appellate court proceedings, broadcast of appellate oral arguments are rarely allowed at the state or the federal level.  Some Supreme Court justices have previously noted their opposition to broadcasting the Court’s proceedings, expressing concern that it would turn the proceedings into entertainment, and (because most of the justices’ work takes place outside of oral arguments) would give the public a misleading impression of the Court’s work.

Although the Supreme Court’s decision to make available an audio recording and transcript of the health care arguments later each day is a step in the right direction, it did not go far enough.  The general public has been able to view live Congressional debates and committee hearings for many years.  Although these broadcasts may provide “entertainment” to some, their real value is in the “education” they provide to those who care to watch them.  At least as much can be learned by watching these broadcasts, than by reviewing the Congressional Record transcripts.  Audiovisual broadcasts also promote transparency and accountability in government.  The same would apply to the Supreme Court’s oral arguments.  Some states’ highest courts, including Alaska and Massachusetts, have been broadcasting their oral arguments and archiving them on Internet websites for years, without apparent harm to the integrity of the courts.  // Michael Racette

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • Email

Do We Need Lawyers?

"I want to talk to my buddy--no, wait."

Load More

  • Recent
  • Trending
  • Popular
  • Waiters Get Back $500K Tips From Greedy NYC Restaurant
  • Supreme Court Saves SCOTUScare, Scalia Regrets
  • Justice Clarence Thomas Sides With Liberals On Free Speech
  • Uber Just Unwillingly Hired All Its California Drivers
  • Supreme Court Lets Eminem Style Off The Hook
2paragraphs on APPLE NEWS | 2paragraphs Amazon Shop | SEE MORE 2paragraphs ARTICLES
  • About 2paragraphs
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Dedication
  • Map
  • Fresh
  • Law
  • How-To
  • Personal
  • Books

© 2012-2023, 2paragraphs Productions, LLC

  • Buffer
  • Diggit
  • Email
  • More
  • Facebook
  • Flattr
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • Stumble
  • tumblr
  • Twitter
  • VK
  • WhatsApp
  • Yummly
  • Xing